Artificial intelligence impact on news is a bleak warning for all of us
Journalism’s imperfections are like a blessing if compared to the dystopic scenarios AI can create if operating by incentives unrelated to the greater good.
- trust (1)
- technology (13)
- media (18)
- disruption (1)
- news (7)
- Artificial intelligence (3)
- AI (5)
- journalism (40)
- regulation (1)
- truth (3)
- doubt (1)
- reality (3)
- simulation (2)
- capitalism (1)
- consumer-facing technology (1)
- monopoly (1)
- competition (1)
- post-truth (1)
- audience fragmentation (1)
- disinformation (12)
- market (1)
- incentives (1)
- financial markets (1)
- information manipulation (1)
- awareness (1)
- tech industry (1)
- layoffs (1)
- market failure (1)
- disinformation-tackling industry (1)
- surveillance (2)
- business model (7)
- audience (2)
- freedom of speech (4)
- government surveillance (1)
- online censorship (1)
- UK (1)
- public debate (1)
- noise (1)
- societal malaise (1)
- political polarization (1)
- NYT (2)
- context (1)
- social cohesion (1)
- inequality (2)
- media credibility (1)
- fox news (1)
- diversity (1)
- risks (1)
- copyright (3)
- legal battles (1)
- YouTube (2)
- DMCA (1)
- video (4)
- social media (14)
- monitoring (1)
- trends (1)
- transparency (2)
- tech companies (1)
- microblogging (1)
- user privacy (1)
- bluesky (1)
- heavy users (2)
- hyperreality (1)
- postmodern (1)
- blockchain (1)
- information integrity (1)
- markets (1)
- about (1)
- polarisation (1)
- economic decline (1)
- networks (1)
- Fake news (2)
- percolation (1)
- theory (1)
- immigration (1)
- reverberation box (1)
- twitter (6)
- russian (1)
- Internet (5)
- Splinternet (1)
- Meta (3)
- Google (10)
- capitalism (2)
- technology (11)
- WWI (1)
- populism (1)
- privacy (7)
- social media platforms (1)
- users (3)
- data (2)
- privacy protection (2)
- ChatGPT (1)
- Facebook (8)
- Twitter (3)
- China (1)
- Europe (1)
- AI regulation (1)
- Elon Musk (1)
- digital platforms (1)
- social media (5)
- regulation (3)
- OpenAI (1)
- Google (7)
- Meta (1)
- ChatGPT (1)
- society (8)
- reality (2)
- debate (2)
- misinformation (1)
- content (13)
- media (32)
- information (10)
- audience (15)
- journalism (23)
- subscriptions (1)
- tech giants (3)
- user data (1)
- data breaches (1)
- GDPR (1)
- liberal elites (1)
- Splinternet (1)
- conservatives (1)
- debate (2)
- democracy (4)
- solutions (1)
- Western (1)
- societies (1)
- tennis (1)
- amazon (1)
- US Open (1)
- reputation (1)
- trade (1)
- sustainable (1)
- tech (1)
- Facebook (10)
- addiction (2)
- oversharing (1)
- surveillance (1)
- mídia (8)
- poder (1)
- fake news (1)
- Trump (2)
- bolsonaro (1)
- populism (1)
- SEO richest words: news (1)
- bleeding (1)
- advertising (12)
- Trump (1)
- revenue (2)
- brand (1)
- digital (22)
- publications (2)
- election (1)
- United States (1)
- local (3)
- news deserts (1)
- crise (3)
- Digital (14)
- Darth Vader (1)
- tech hopefuls (1)
- evil cluster (1)
- tech companies (1)
- superstar economy (1)
- education (3)
- Islamic State (1)
- marco feliciano (1)
- web (4)
- publishers (1)
- traffic (2)
- algorithm (1)
- engagement (1)
- advertisement (2)
- impact (1)
- TV (1)
- mídia (3)
- digitalização (1)
- anunciantes (1)
- customer (1)
- revenue (3)
- attention (1)
- ad blockers (1)
- digital (3)
- consumption (1)
- growth (5)
- value (1)
- freedom of speech (2)
- privacy (3)
- abuse of power (1)
- brasil (6)
- jornalismo (6)
- inovação (2)
- data (3)
- dystopias (1)
- digital journalism (1)
- newspapers (7)
- traditional media (4)
- news production (1)
- new media (1)
- piracy (4)
- copyright (2)
- entertainment (1)
- streaming services (1)
- users (2)
- personal content (1)
- context collapse (1)
- dominance. (1)
- guardian (1)
- infographic (1)
- panama papers (1)
- Buzzfeed (1)
- pageviews (1)
- microblog (1)
- Twitter (3)
- service (1)
- growth (2)
- Content (2)
- Web (1)
- net neutrality (2)
- Web (1)
- liberdade (1)
- ameaças (1)
- Brasil (1)
- Internet (5)
- relevance (1)
- Innovation (1)
- newsrooms (5)
- participation (1)
- benefit (1)
- content (2)
- liquid (1)
- platform (2)
- students (1)
- online media (1)
- journalists (4)
- Dinosaurs (1)
- dominance (1)
- Media (2)
- market (8)
- messaging (1)
- communication (6)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Traditional Education (1)
- Research (1)
- Communication (2)
- University (1)
- decision (1)
- relevance (1)
- freedom (2)
- content modeling (1)
- audiences (1)
- information curators (1)
- marketing (1)
- power (3)
- future (3)
- newspapers (3)
- connectivity (2)
- information (2)
- profit (1)
- products (1)
- censorship (2)
- document (1)
- Hollywood (4)
- marketing (2)
- industry (5)
- films (2)
- telecommunications (1)
- monopoly (1)
- The 5 most mentioned keywords in the text are: media landscape (1)
- independence (1)
- social change (1)
- digital medium (1)
- traditional media. (1)
- validation (1)
- slowing (1)
- user (1)
- base (1)
- reach (1)
- organic (1)
- YouTube (1)
- video (2)
- Brazil (1)
- web (1)
- neutrality (1)
- companies (5)
- neutralidade da web (1)
- legislação (1)
- scale (1)
- production (1)
- richness (1)
- networks (1)
- copyright law (1)
- intellectual property rights (1)
- newsmaking (1)
- news (4)
- environment (1)
- future (2)
- rupture (1)
- academy (2)
- realidade (1)
- fatos (1)
- authoritarianism (2)
- riches (1)
- education (1)
- embraced (1)
- chaos (1)
- beginning (1)
- TPB (1)
- digital era (1)
- mobile (4)
- trend (1)
- innovation (2)
- publishing (1)
- academia (1)
- digital journalism (2)
- new digital formats (1)
- traditional journalism (3)
- credibility (4)
- El Pais (2)
- error (1)
- Chávez (1)
- tv (1)
- cobertura (1)
- coverage (4)
- protestos (1)
- são paulo (1)
- government surveillance (1)
- transparency (3)
- Boston (1)
- tragedy (1)
- senseless (1)
- riqueza (2)
- modelo de negócios (1)
- jornalismo (1)
- inovação (2)
- tecnologias (1)
- Content quality (1)
- distribution (3)
- publication success (1)
- quality content (1)
- Netflix (2)
- pricing (1)
- piracy (3)
- TV (1)
- projetos (1)
- pesquisa (1)
- informação (1)
- Pirate Party (1)
- SEO richest words: revenue (1)
- revenues (1)
- apartheid (1)
- mecenato (1)
- rádio (1)
- SEO (3)
- crowdsourcing (4)
- Wikipedia (1)
- Apple (1)
- Amazon (1)
- search (1)
- mobile (2)
- gadgets (1)
- MOOC (1)
- ensino (1)
- online (1)
- educação (1)
- sociedade (1)
- press (3)
- personalization (1)
- knowledge (1)
- social networks (2)
- accountability (1)
- print (2)
- titles (1)
- magazines (1)
- traffic (2)
- monetization (1)
- important (2)
- newspaper (1)
- Spain (1)
- crisis (1)
- generation (1)
- links (1)
- Crisis (1)
- Greece (1)
- blogs (2)
- yells (1)
- quality (3)
- sore loser (1)
- resource (1)
- digital era (2)
- Twitter curatorship tools (1)
- milestone (1)
- curation tools (1)
- Cooperative (1)
- alternative (1)
- news deserts (1)
- local news (1)
- passes (1)
- local journalism (1)
- boicote (1)
- competition (4)
- change (3)
- Audience (2)
- IPO (1)
- investment (1)
- business (2)
- risks (1)
- salários (1)
- produto (1)
- curation (1)
- crowdsourcing (2)
- jobs (1)
- journalists (2)
- research (1)
- busca (1)
- nicho (1)
- negócios (1)
- modelo (1)
- social network (1)
- Brasil (1)
- acesso (1)
- banda larga (1)
- Privacy Wars (2)
- Advertising Revenue (1)
- Do Not Track (1)
- credibility (1)
- accountability (2)
- Queen (1)
- IPO (1)
- sociedade (1)
- valores (1)
- revolution (1)
- report (1)
- traditional (3)
- bloggers (2)
- cnn (1)
- visibility (1)
- advertiser (1)
- cispa (1)
- congress (1)
- dictatorship (1)
- paywall (1)
- Tech (1)
- Society (3)
- platforms (1)
- public interest (1)
- digital media (1)
- open journalism (1)
- kony (1)
- changes (2)
- social media platforms (1)
- capital (1)
- Arab Spring (1)
- Occupy Wall Street (1)
- SOPA (2)
- censorship (1)
- Crowdturfing (1)
- entertainment (1)
- tabloids (1)
- scandal (1)
- online (1)
- print (1)
- TV. (1)
- patents (1)
- digital innovation (1)
- internet (1)
- virtual (1)
- governments (1)
- article (1)
- fact-checking (1)
- traditional (1)
- Revolution (1)
- Society (1)
- Journalism (1)
- London (1)
- riots (1)
- entertainment industry (1)
- Google+ (1)
- social (1)
- killing (1)
- Woodward (1)
- Bernstein (1)
- photographic agency (1)
- user-generated images (1)
- UGC (1)
- content industry (1)
- wikipedia (1)
- engagement (1)
- exposure (1)
- ocupar (1)
- Wall Street (1)
- movimento (1)
- london riots (1)
- coverage (1)
- death (1)
- transition (1)
- business (1)
- danger (1)
- journalist (2)
- professional (2)
- community (1)
- huffington post (2)
- challenge (1)
- evolution (1)
- revolutionizes (1)
- responsibility (1)
- law (1)
- Hulu (1)
- Fox (1)
- journalist (1)
- followers (1)
- publications (1)
- localization (1)
- criticism (1)
- cost (1)
- focus (1)
- Apple (1)
- Yahoo (1)
- scandals (1)
- tabloids (1)
- phone hacking (1)
- challenge (1)
- wikileaks (1)
- wired (1)
- Journalism (1)
- distance (1)
- communities (1)
- Daily Dot (1)
- MySpace (1)
- Microsoft (1)
- Skype (1)
- BBC (2)
- jornais (1)
- investem (1)
- zero (1)
- jornadas (1)
- SEO richest words: companies (1)
- bloggers (1)
- citizen journalism (1)
- profession (1)
- iPhone (1)
- wealthy (1)
- local (1)
- Brazil (1)
- today (1)
- Cisco (1)
- revolution (1)
- syntax (1)
- language (1)
- data journalism (1)
- Guardian (1)
- money (1)
- Wall Street (1)
- social interaction (1)
Will AI repeat the legal battles that video once faced?
In 2006, every analyst thought Google would have endless legal battles when it bought YouTube. Will the same happen with AI?
It’s not the first time we go through this…
Echoes of history reverberate the stress, disinformation, and the rise of populist leaders mirror pre-WWI tensions. Today's technological advancements and capitalism's unchecked pursuit unravel eerie parallels, urging introspection for a more equitable future.
AI is not a luxury, is a must-have for those seeking global dominion
Artificial intelligence is the battleground for money, minds and hearts of our generation, and there is none in this fight to be the custodian of public interests.
The guns of August are set to fire in the AI battlefield
OpenAI started a new Gold Race between the candidates to rule the future at the expense of the billions.